22

Jun
Facebook
Instagram
Good Authority
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • 2024 Election
  • Ukraine
  • Israel-Hamas
  • Congress
  • Good Chats
  • Good to Know
  • Podcast
  • Resources
☰
Good Authority
Home > News > Here's one way marriage equality is no longer like Loving or Roe
799 views 2 min 0 Comment

Here's one way marriage equality is no longer like Loving or Roe

Patrick Egan - April 29, 2015

Here at the Monkey Cage, I’ve attempted to put the Supreme Court’s consideration of same-sex marriage rights into perspective by comparing public opinion on the issue to two other social controversies addressed by the Court in landmark decisions in the past: interracial marriage (in Loving v. Virginia, 1967) and abortion rights (Roe v. Wade, 1973).  I’ve argued that the trajectory of public opinion on gay marriage — and in particular, substantial generational differences in  attitudes on gay rights — make it seem likely that Americans are moving toward a broad national consensus in support for marriage equality (as currently exists for interracial marriage) rather than the continued bitter divide of the kind we see on abortion.
But due to recent developments, the issue of same-sex marriage is now different from that of both interracial marriage and abortion in a critical way.  That’s because Americans’ support for gays’ right to marry now — as the Court considers the marriage equality cases currently before it in Obergefell v. Hodges — is substantially higher than it was for interracial marriage in 1967 or abortion rights in 1973.

As displayed in the figure above, a majority (52 percent) of Americans now supports the right of gays and lesbians to legally marry.  (Shown are estimates from the Pew Research Center, which has been thoroughly documenting trends in opinion on this issue since 1996 and most recently surveyed Americans on this issue in 2014; most other polls put support even higher.)  This was pointedly not true when the Court issued rulings in landmark cases on interracial marriage (an NORC poll in 1968 put support for overturning miscegenation bans at 44 percent) or abortion (support for the legal right to abortion under “elective” circumstances in the 1973 General Social Survey stood at 48 percent).
In short, when the court expanded abortion rights and marriage rights in Loving and Roe, it was issuing classically counter-majoritarian opinions.  By contrast, the only way it can do so now is with a decision in Obergefell that fails to find that lesbian and gay couples have a right to marry.

Topics on this page
AmericansCourtGeneral Social SurveyNORC at the University of ChicagoObergefell v. HodgesPew Research CenterRoe v. Wade

Related

PREVIOUS

The solution to lobbying is more lobbying

NEXT

Does getting Internet access make people better citizens? Maybe not.

Placeholder image
Patrick Egan

Related Posts

Good Authority
Here’s one way marriage equality is no longer like Loving or Roe
Good Authority
What if Marriage Equality Is <i>Loving</i> Instead of <i>Roe</i>?
Good Authority
The Emerging Marriage Majority
Good Authority
Support for same-sex marriage is increasing faster than ever before
Good Authority
The Myth of “The Social Issues”: The Politics of Abortion and the Politics of Gay Rights are Different
Good Authority
Liz Cheney's view of gay marriage makes her a normal Republican
Good Authority
© Copyright 2026 - GoodAuthority.org. All Rights Reserved
All Good Authority content is published under a Creative Commons license and can be republished subject to these conditions.
Loading...
Sign up for our weekly newsletter