Benjamin Page, “Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections”:http://www.amazon.com/Choices-Echoes-Presidential-Elections-Electoral/dp/0226644715 (1978):
bq. Indeed, the most striking feature of candidates’ rhetoric about policy is its extreme vagueness. The typical campaign speech says virtually nothing specific about policy alternatives; discussions of the issues are hidden away in little-publicized statements and position papers. Even the most extended discussions leave many questions unanswered. In short, policy stands are infrequent, inconspicuous, and unspecific.
“Wall Street Journal”:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575468074166599754.html?mod=djem_jiewr_PS_domainid (9/3/10):
bq. House Republicans are hunting for an election-season middle ground on which they can make promises to voters without providing enough details to be attacked by Democrats…
bq. …Many Republicans argue that there is nothing to be gained politically by being so detailed, particularly at a time when Republicans are already expected to make large gains in the November elections. A pair of recent speeches by House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio were heavy on critiques of President Barack Obama and light on details of what he would do as House Speaker.