Tom Ricks doesn't know what he's talking about
[caption id="attachment_16224" align="aligncenter" width="300"] The journal International Security publishes articles
Tom Ricks doesn’t know what he’s talking about
[caption id="attachment_16224" align="aligncenter" width="300"] The journal International Security publishes articles
If policymakers had listened to political scientists, we wouldn't have invaded Iraq
[caption id="attachment_16126" align="aligncenter" width="4400"] (MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images)[/caption] Tom Ricks suggests
If policymakers had listened to political scientists, we wouldn’t have invaded Iraq
[caption id="attachment_16126" align="aligncenter" width="4400"] (MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images)[/caption] Tom Ricks suggests
Why Care About the O’Bagy Affair?
"Tom Ricks":http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/09/12/a_word_in_semi_defense_of_e_obagy and "Dave Weigel":http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/09/12/in_partial_defense_of_the_disgraced_syria_scholar_with_the_fake_degree.html partially defend Elizabeth O'Bagy, the
Political Science Journals as Indirect Lobbying
"Thomas Ricks":http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/10/04/the_air_force_once_again_is_leaving_the_field_of_strategic_discourse_to_others posts a disturbing - if not exactly surprising