2016 was an ordinary election, not a realignment
[caption id="attachment_49160" align="aligncenter" width="960"] Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton face
The not-quite-as-depressing psychological theory that explains Washington
[caption id="attachment_5093" align="aligncenter" width="696" special=""] (Linda Davidson/The Washington Post)[/caption] Over
More on those “Psychological Science” papers (menstrual cycles and political attitudes, biceps size and political attitudes)
I was thinking some more about those two recent studies
Jost Haidt
Research psychologist John Jost reviews the recent book, "The Righteous
“The Party of the American Working Man and Woman”
Jonathan Haidt writes that “the Republicans are increasingly becoming the party
Lamentably ignorant psychology researcher spews political platitudes without realizing that he’s trying to explain a phenomenon that does not exist
Details (and anguished scream) here. I think the problem is
Same old story
In a review of psychologist Jonathan Haidt's recent book, "The
More on the missing conservative psychology researchers
Will Wilkinson adds to the discussion of Jonathan Haidt's remarks