Steven Levitt says that he has a “good indicator” that Aaron Edlin, Noah Kaplan, Nate Silver, and I are “not so smart” Andrew Gelman - October 25, 2012 Here's the transcript (link from here): DUBNER: So Levitt, how
The Long Run Dynamics of Territorial Disputes Doug Gibler - October 10, 2012 In my last post I suggested that public reactions of
Compared to national popular vote, the electoral college favors voters in small states (on average), not large states. It’s because of those extra 2 electoral votes that each state gets! Andrew Gelman - July 31, 2012 The other day, in discussing the virtues of the electoral
Jonathan Chait and I agree about the importance of the fundamentals in determining presidential elections Andrew Gelman - April 12, 2011 Johathan Chait writes: Parties and candidates will kill themselves to
Forget the Dukakis-in-a-tank effect: the Democrats would’ve lost in 1988 even if they’d had Burt Reynolds at the top of the ticket Andrew Gelman - April 9, 2011 Jonathan Chait writes that the most important aspect of a
Yes, it can be rational to vote. Yes, your vote could determine the outcome of the election. Maybe if 90% of well-educated, older white people do something, we shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss it as “irrational.” Etc. Andrew Gelman - January 20, 2011 Seeing as the Freakonomics people were kind enough to link
Why Such a Quick Coalition Formation? Erik Voeten - May 12, 2010 I agree with Matt Yglesias that it is pretty amazing
What Do We Know About Minority Governments? Erik Voeten - May 7, 2010 And so the British have their "hung parliament." While there
Ideological Polarization and the Lib Dem vote. Henry Farrell - May 6, 2010 "Matthew Yglesias":http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/05/blame-the-electoral-system-or-blame-the-party-leaders.php talks about the UK party system. bq. For
Free polsci journals for you Henry Farrell - January 29, 2010 The _British Journal of Political Science_ (usually regarded as not